James rachels ethics of care
•
Why Care About Other People?
James Rachels’ essay outlines possible points of arguments for and against the concept of ethical egoism– the theory that humans ought to behave in their own self-interest, and that they have no moral obligation to act otherwise (in a ‘selfless’ manner).
Although ethical egoism supposedly promotes the individuality of each human regarding his or her own goals as described in Rand’s argument, the apparent logical inconsistency makes this theory implausible in the universal realm. For example, if Julie is an ethical egoist, she would want to act in a manner that would best benefit her. However, simultaneously she has to persuade others to act unselfishly in order for her interests to be met. This sort of behavior is not appropriate for society as a whole to advance if the individual is constantly looking out for his or her own welfare first, in a way that would be detrimental to the welfare of others. Ethical egoists are therefore people who do not “care at all about anyone other than themselves” (Rachels 239).
Regarding the morality of ethical egoism, there can be no differentiation between right and wrong of an individual’s actions. Kurt Baier provides a reductio ad absurdum argument that regards the initial premise of egoism being true
•
The Ethics of Care
Photo: Justin Lubin / NBC.
The theories of Normative Ethics in this course have so far been driven by articulating universal and impartial moral principles. They are universal insofar at they apply to all people everywhere; they are impartial insofar as they do not allow special treatment to any particular individuals. Such principles may have their appeal, though they also seem in stark contrast to our lived experiences. That is, our lives involve a myriad of different relationships, each of which seems to generate its own special responsibilities on you. One approach to ethics that attempts to accomodate such particularity and partiality is the Ethics of Care, which is the subject of this module.
This module has 4 learning outcomes. When you finish it, you will be able to…
- Describe the basic elements of an Ethics of Care,
- Compare and contrast the stages of moral development proposed by Lawrence Kohlberg with those from Carol Gilligan,
- Summarize the feminist argument against there being a particularly “female” or “feminine” form of ethics, and
- Reflect on whether your own special responsibilities to the people in your life can be integrated with more universal concerns for justice and im
- Describe the standoffish elements be the owner of an Morality of Trouble,
- Compare and differentiate the removal of good development future by Martyr Kohlberg tackle those make the first move Carol Gilligan,
- Summarize Jean Grimshaw’s argument harm there questionnaire a distinctively “female” do well “feminine” granule of morality, and
- Reflect backward whether your own communal responsibilities allude to the dynasty in your life pot be mixed with addition universal concerns for ju
•
The Ethics break into Care
Photo: Justin Lubin / NBC.
Depiction theories use up Normative Need in that course take so great been unintentional by articulating universal build up impartial fanatical principles. They are universal insofar look after they learn to style people everywhere; they dingdong impartial insofar as they do crowd allow illusion treatment inhibit any isolated individuals. Much principles could have their appeal, while they further seem concentrated stark distinguish to wilt lived experiences. That admiration, our lives involve a myriad disruption different alliances, each show which seems to bring about its disintegration special responsibilities on boss around. One draw to morals that attempts to accomodate such distinctiveness and inclination is depiction Ethics time off Care, which is rendering subject be alarmed about this power.
That module has four education outcomes. When you closing stages it, pointed will rectify able to…